Thursday, August 30, 2012

Language and Ideology


"What is represented in ideology is therefore not the system of the real relations which govern the existence of individuals, but the imaginary relation of those individuals to the real relations in which they live" 
Ideology is a reflection of the best possible reality.  Key word: reflection.
 I idealize my puppy.  She never chews shreds the paper towels I clean up her pittle spills with.  Ever.  I didn't come home this morning to my mother yelling "Elizabeth, you need to clean up blah blbha blaha blahghgaghghghghgh" ***that was sarcasm, in case you missed it.


 Marxy (Karl and I are old friends) says that ideologies are deceptive because they represent a world that does not really exist.  Althusser takes a similar, yet different approach.  It is a sort of expansion of the Marxist idea: He describes ideology as “a ‘representation’ of the imaginary relationship of individuals to their real conditions of existence”.   Just like Marxists, he claims that ideology is not a true reflection of the real world, but it’s not a really reflection of the world at all.  Ideologies instead “represent” the “imaginary relationship of individuals” to the real world.  
The thing that ideology represents, or rather misrepresents, is already removed from what is real.  We cannot truly understand what is real because we are hindered by language (Lacan), and therefore we cannot escape ideology because of our reliance on language.  Language cannot truly represent what is real and therefore binds us to ideology.  Language is just a symbolic representation of reality.  We are forced to use ideology to try to understand or explain what is real.  We use language to show the relationship between people and the world. 
Althusser explains that even if we understand that ideologies are “illusions”, we must admit that they do make allusions to reality.  Those allusions need only be interpreted in order to understand reality.  Ideology is an illusion, yet an allusion to reality at the same time.  While referencing reality, [...______...] cannot truly represent it because our reality cannot be based on social constructed ideologies.  The ideological state apparatus includes institutions such as family, education, religion, politics, and the arts.  These ideologies are not true representations of what is real.  They are imaginary representations of individuals to reality.  The ideal family consists of a mother, father, and children.   The institute of family does not always follow this pattern.  It is a concept created to represent a "truth".  I would not go so far to say that family is not real.  It is, according to Althusser, an ideology used to represent the relation of the members of a family to the concept of the family itself.
In conclusion, ideologies are the attempts to portray “reality”.  They are the illusions we use to allude to the “real” world.  They are imaginary and will always fail because we are bound to language.

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Down the Rabbit Hole


A Disjointed, Free-Writing, Interpretive Essay on Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland from an Eclectic’s Perspective

Do your stretches first.  Reach for the sky, then swan dive to the floor, keeping your legs straight, and stretch those hammies until they burn. Take a deep breath, reach for the sky, and exhaling, gently dive back down again.  Now let’s go down the rabbit hole.  It’s going to be a bumpy ride, but we’ll emerge stronger and more enlightened at the end of this contemplative expedition.

“Mad people are always the best,” Alice’s father tells her at a grueling garden party.  This is often true. After all, new ideas are frequently seen as madness…Einstein was viewed by many as being as crazy as his hair. (Lady Gaga, anyone? Her madness is worth millions.)  Those of us who are cultural anomalies find it seemingly impossible sometimes to stand up for our hairdos, especially when they are different everyday, depending on how we slept the night before. 

Alice’s father represents her world of bizarre dreams and ideas, as he reinforced her creativity and ingenuity.  I mean, wouldn’t you be more likely to run out to an ice cream truck playing “Poker Face” instead of “Do Your Ears Hang Low”?  The White Rabbit’s ears stuck straight up, and he was more concerned about Maryanne bring him his gloves than sitting down and having a creamsicle.   Moreover, Alice’s father is not the quintessential patriarch of the era in which the story is set. 

In the wondiforous  world of is is isn’t, and isn’t is, her mother is naturally the head of the roost.  She is the dominant household leader, and tries her best to stuff her daughter in a Victorian Alice-in-a-box.  To her mother’s dismay, Alice learned how to wind her own crank, and her mother’s temper.  She nonchalantly “forgets” to put on her corset, and pops out her own engagement party. 

She burns all metaphorical bridges, and attempts pyromaniacy with the metaphorical ramps to the Gazeebo on which her arranged fiancĂ©, Hamish, proposes to her in front of her friends and family.  Alice is brave, and refuses to let Hamish’s feigned burning passion squash her creativity.  In front of the entire party, she refuses the proposal and runs away.  Her mother obviously remembered nothing from her lessons on Newton.  For every engagement party, there is an equal and opposite dive down the Rabbit hole into Wonderland, or Underland. 

Down the Rabbit hole she goes, following her own imaginative rabbit into a world that claims its own logic, equally opposite her mother’s.  Submersed in her own projected reality, she loses the independent thinking she used to cultivate it.  In her own illogical world, she finds she has no option than to give up everything about her considered unique, her “muchness” as she calls it. 

In her own unexplored dream, she has no other option than to try to fit in suing the knowledge of pre-established roles (just as her mother expected her to do at the garden party).  Her creativity was completely stunted, being overwhelmed by the world she herself created.  In Underland, she has to learn to follow her own path, completely unaware that she had paved it herself.  She has to discover who she is, and learn to have the courage to fight her own demons, assisted by her own angels. 

At first, she is so insecure with who she is and who she is not in Underland that she, and many others in her dream world including the pessimistic caterpillar, Absalom, are not convinced that she is the Alice—the Alice destined to save Underland.  Such is the absurdity of fate and providence.  Development coincides with being shaped into a predetermined mold, and new ideas are considered madness, yet we are all expected to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune with naught but our predecessors’ knowledge and experience instead of our own.  I’ve been there, I’ve done that.  When will Homo sapiens learn that the most important lessons in life are learned independently? 

Alice is equipped to deal with the obstacles of her own reality, but how is a goldfish supposed to know there’s another world outside of his bowl?  How is he supposed to escape the little plastic castle unless he jumps into the toilet and is flushed down the hole? Poor things only have a two-second memory, so thanks to their own “lucky” line of evolution, they don’t have to worry about it.  Alice, on the other hand, has to be flushed down into her own imagination to be saved from her own villains, and to learn to distinguish between the two.  She had to learn the answers to the classic questions of the human condition on her own. 
           
            Is this the real me, or am I an imposter acting out a part on the world’s stage?
            Should I be trusted?
            Will I survive, and how?
            Can I suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune?
            How the hell am I supposed to discern reality from my own imagination?

When I find myself asking these questions, I say to myself, “You cannot know; the Truth will present itself”.  I just have to choose between the blue pill and the red, fall down the rabbit hole until I learn that I am The One, and no matter how many came before me.  Me, myself, and I will decide how this dream will end.  Only I can decide how deep it goes. 

The opposite of fear is compassion. The opposite of sympathy is empathy.  The opposite of reality is a dream.  I learned in psych that dreams are just a technique the brain uses to store the information it wants to keep, filing it away in compartments on a spectrum of short term and long term.  If you’re lucky, you can move the filing cabinet and find a hole that ends in John Malcovich’s mind.  I’m sure you’ve heard that you can never die in a dream, or you will die in real life.  A dream remembered is a dream interrupted, because in the sleep of death, what possible dreams may come? 

One’s safety depends on the safety of loved ones.  Why else, when fear takes hold, do we try so hard to escape them? It’s important to remember that we must love ourselves before we can love someone else.  Alice protects first and foremost the Mad Hatter, her alter ego, the person she is deep down, flashing like a colorful and unpredictable neon sign.  She must learn its history by recognizing the patterns of its light.  In order to save her own light from burning out, to save her own identity, she must save the Mad Hatter.  He is her primary supporter. After all, you are your number one fan.  The Mad Hater’s most vital quality is that he not only needs her to persevere and succeed, he wants her to. 

Soon enough, he learns that Alice serves the White Queen, the queen of purity, not the renowned Red Queen of Hearts, the queen of blood and death.  The Red Queen represents Alice’s mother, the patriarch of her authoritarian high society.  The entirety of the Red Queen’s subjects fears her because who in their right mind wouldn’t fear death?  They fear madness and uniqueness. The White Queen is set apart, holy in her sister’s tyranny.  She is Goldylock’s porridge—not too hot, not too cold, but juuuuuusttt right!

Alice’s quest is to save Underland from the Red Queen, from the totalitarianism that opposes originality so harshly.  She must restore the White Queen’s power, which will restore values of constructive introspection, individual sovereignty, and allow the madness required to create one’s own reality.  To do this, she has to defeat the Red Queen’s Jabberwocky with the White Queen’s magical sword, the mythical creature’s only Kryptonite.  In order to slay the creature, she must learn not to instinctively flee the situation she perceives as harmful, but learn why it is harmful.  In order to wake up from a dream, one must distinguish and separate it from reality. Discernment is crucial.

When Alice screams, “Off with your Head!”, and slices through the Jabberwocky’s neck with the White Queen’s sword of discernment, she cuts off everything she hates: boundaries and rules fettering the enhancement of her Self, and the perpetuating destruction of creativity.  She has won the battle against conventional roles of her time, found the freedom to refuse Hamish’s proposal, and start her own adventure.  As we all do in every REM cycle, Alice found solace in her own dream; Her transformation is complete. 


Monday, February 27, 2012

Hila Plitmann-Five Hebrew Love Songs

I'm supposed to sing this at a wedding.  I just got the sheet music, and it's no easy one.  This video of Hila Plitmann is so inspiring.  She makes it seem so easy.  It's second nature to her.  I hope I can make it feel so organic.

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Ultimacy and Morality

This is from a paper I wrote on the Human Condition:


The essence of consciousness is the universal need to distinguish the parameters of morality in order to sustain individual sovereignty. Accepted distinction of right and wrong is fundamental to free decision. Objective, axiomatic moral statute is requisite to the functionality of global civility. Conscience concludes morality, but it is relative.  Innate conscience is objective, but over time it is molded by individual circumstance. Individual perception of an Ultimacy becomes the external criterion upon which an individual justifies his/her judgements of right and wrong.  It is the fundamental fountainhead from which all existence is contrived.  Religion is the means to substantiate the relationship between individual consciousness and a perceived Ultimacy. The need to believe in an omnipotent, omniscient embodiment of existence is derivative from the struggle to establish universal morality.

Monday, February 6, 2012

Over-thinking the Tao with Dostoevsky's Men

I've been simultaneously studying Dostoevsky and Eastern Religion. In East-West Literary Relations we were reading Notes from Underground while at the same time, my 1000-level Religion class was discovering Hinduism.




 My adventure into Dostoevsky continued with The Grand Inquistor and Dream of a Ridiculous Man. My comprehensive proficiency is Eastern worldviews expanded into the Confucian philosophies and Taoism.

My studies (specifics will follow) have not only influenced, but perpetuated my investigation into the basic principles of the "human condition" on societal, familial, and individual levels.  I am trying to expand the human condition into an intergalactic viewpoint, as in a fictitious intergalactic society with a "conscientious condition". The conscientious condition is the set of distinctive and inexorable features of conscientious intelligence in a society or culture.


In my investigation, I ask myself a few general questions:  
-What is the definition of a religion?  
-Why do religions exist?  
-What regulations should be in effect in order to ensure liberty, peace, and equality? 
-Is morality too relative/subjective to be universalized?  
-What is the essence of man?
-Furthermore, what is the essence of conscience? 
-Can conscience be regulated? 
-If there was a Canon to govern intergalactic morality, what would it look like?  
-What constitutes having a conscience?

I'll answer the first question here with my definition of religion: It is a change in a person's conscience (interchangeable with spirit or soul) caused by acceptance of an Ultimacy (a purpose and direction for life).

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Hearse--Ani DiFranco Cover



I fashioned my own little version of "Hearse" off Ani DiFranco's newly-released album "Which Side are You On?"